Nigeria’s ‘Zero-Ransom Era’: New Dawn under Defence Minister Musa
Late 2025 marked a turning point in Nigeria’s fight against kidnapping, terrorism, and banditry. With the confirmation of Christopher Gwabin Musa (Gen. Musa) as the new Ministry of Defence Nigeria (MoD) boss, the government dropped a very deliberate — and bold — policy shift: no more negotiations, no more ransom payments to kidnappers or terrorists.
Below is a deep-dive into what the “zero-ransom era” means, why it was adopted, and what challenges lie ahead.
✅ Why the Zero-Ransom Policy Was Deemed Necessary
• Ransoms fuel the kidnapping / terrorism business
- According to a recent report, ransom payments in Nigeria between May 2023 and April 2024 hit a staggering ₦2.23 trillion — an amount larger than the country’s 2024 defence budget.
- With kidnappers raking in such huge sums, ransom-based abductions have morphed into a thriving — and lucrative — criminal enterprise. The payment of ransom does more than just free hostages: it provides the cash to rearm, recruit, and plan new attacks.
- Recognising this vicious cycle, Musa argued during his Senate screening that “paying ransom buys terrorists time to regroup, re-arm and plan new attacks.”
• The country cannot afford ransom-economy over defence
- That staggering ransom sum (₦2.23 trillion) — nearly equal to a full year’s defence allocation — underscores a grim truth: resources meant to protect Nigerians were effectively being redirect-spent into criminal coffers.
- By outlawing ransom payments, the government aims to dry up a central funding stream for kidnappers and terrorists. As Musa put it: end the payments, end the business.
• Shift from reactive payouts to proactive security strategy
- Musa underscored that military operations — the traditional reply to kidnappings — represent only 25–30 % of what is needed to win the war.
- The rest, he says, lies in good governance, intelligence, robust legal systems, community cooperation, and socioeconomic reform.
- Crucially, he is calling for a unified national database linking citizens, banking, identity, travel, and other systems — a modern security-infrastructure move designed to make criminals traceable across states.
📜 What the New Strategy Involves
Under the new leadership of Gen. Musa and with fresh backing from the legislative branch, Nigeria’s approach to insecurity is being revamped — not just tactically but structurally. Key components:
- Absolute ban on ransom payments and negotiations — no more dealing with kidnappers or terrorists under any conditions.
- Legal reinforcement — lawmakers are pushing to classify kidnapping, hostage-taking, and related violent crimes explicitly as terrorism, and to impose the death penalty on perpetrators, their financiers, informants, or anyone aiding them.
- Intelligence-driven operations — heavier reliance on data, technology and intelligence, rather than brute force alone.
- Unified national database — a centralised information system tying together identity records, banking, travel, and other data to allow better tracking of individuals.
- Reorientation of security deployment — as part of his plan, Musa proposed to withdraw soldiers from routine checkpoints and redeploy them for targeted missions in forests and ungoverned spaces, leaving police and civil defence corps to manage roadblocks.
- Justice-sector reforms — expedite trials for terrorism/kidnapping cases, discourage years-long delays, establish special courts, and ensure swift convictions.
—
💡 What This Might Mean for Nigerians — And What Remains to Be Done
✅ Potential Gains
- Over time, ending ransom payments could significantly reduce the financing available to kidnappers, making kidnapping less profitable and discouraging new recruits.
- A unified national database + enhanced intelligence could make it harder for criminals to relocate, hide, or operate across states undetected — classic mobility disruption.
- Broader reforms (legal, technological, institutional) signal a long-term shift from reaction to prevention — which, if sustained, could improve national security and restore public confidence.
- The death-penalty amendment might deter would-be kidnappers and financiers. While extreme, it aims to communicate that kidnapping is no longer a “petty crime” but a major threat to national security.
🚧 Real Risks / Challenges Ahead
- Enforcement risk: A hardline stance against ransom means pressure will mount on families whose loved ones are abducted — without guarantees of safe rescue, the policy could come across as cold or dangerous.
- Judicial bottlenecks: Speeding up terrorism/kidnap trials requires a strengthened, well-funded, and fairly run justice system — Nigeria must avoid letting backlogs or corruption derail the promise.
- Database & data-privacy concerns: Building a comprehensive national database is a big technical, logistical and civil-rights undertaking. If poorly managed, it could raise surveillance or privacy issues.
- Community cooperation: Success depends heavily on citizens cooperating with intelligence gathering, rejecting ransom payments, and supporting security reforms — building trust will be crucial.
- Socioeconomic drivers: As Musa notes, poverty, illiteracy and poor governance are at the root of many crimes. Without parallel efforts to address those, criminals may adapt to new tactics or push crimes into other forms.
—
📝 What It Says About the Times: A Strategic Reset for Nigeria
The decision to move into a “zero-ransom era” signals that Nigeria’s leadership — at least for now — sees kidnapping, banditry and terrorism not as isolated crimes, but as existential threats. It’s a recognition that paying ransom doesn’t solve problems — it sustains them.
By recasting abductions as part of a broader security-industrial complex, the government is saying: “This is not just crime. This is war.” And wars are not won by paying off the enemy.
In a way, this is a turning point — potentially a defining moment for Nigeria’s security architecture. Whether this stance leads to reduced kidnappings, safer communities, and restored trust depends on execution.
🕊 A Call for Collective Resolve
For the zero-ransom strategy to succeed, it cannot just be a top-down decree. It needs:
- effective institutional reforms (courts, prisons, justice sector),
- technology and data-integration done the right way,
- sustained community engagement and trust-building,
- attention to the root social and economic causes of crime,
- and a firm commitment from the government
If these pieces come together, this era could be the one where Nigeria finally turns the page on ransom-fueled kidnappings, and begins rebuilding security, stability — and hope.